Picture
The modified Shane Targa (re-named the "Engedi 1") as it is today. . .
Back in the early post Northstar days, sometime shortly after the founding of the original Wavelength Studios, I purchased an electric guitar from a then new start-up company from Virginia.  One of the musical instrument distributers I had a dealership with carried the new brand so I thought I'd give it a try.  "Shane" was the manufacture's name and the model of the guitar was the "Targa".  It was roughly based off the 80's Charvel / Jackson designs.  I think the list price was around $550.00.  I paid around $250.00 dealer cost.  Either way it was a relatively inexpensive guitar but was touted as a good value for the money.  It featured an HSS (humbucker,single coil,single coil) pickup configuration, licensed Flyod Rose vibrato, Schaller style tuners, maple neck and a two octave (24 fret) rosewood fingerboard.  Surprisingly, it, indeed, seemed a good value and played well.  I especially liked the neck with it's traditional full c-shape cut.  The neck felt very similar to that of a Gibson Les Paul, which I found to be an interesting design choice for a "shredder's" guitar.  In fact, the feel of the neck is what kept me coming back to the guitar for studio use and, over time, I began to modify / replace the pick-ups and hardware.  I eventually changed the all black bridge with a chrome Flyod Rose along with chrome tuners, knobs, etc.  I replaced the stock EMG style humbucker with a Seymour Duncan.  I played around with various other single coil pickups over time as well. . .  The headstock shape of the guitar kind of mimicked an 80's Charvel with the addition of an extra flare or "hook" in the middle.  While this type of design was popular for it's day, I always thought it looked too much like a witches hat or something.  I have never been one for sharp angular cuts.  One day I took the neck off and re-cut the headstock with a band saw.  I got rid of the "witches cap"  and rounded off the angles to what was more aesthetically pleasing to my eye.  I continued to use the guitar for recordings. . . 

Picture
Original Shane Targa (pretty much stock minus the gold tuners and knobs).
As I look (or rather listen) back now, I realize just how many recordings this guitar has found its way into!  Classic songs like "Where Is Your Charity?", "Believe In Love" and "A Beautiful Way" to name a few.  Songs which I won awards for. . . Songs which I have plans to re-master and re-release as part of a "best-of" type collection sometime in the future.  This guitar has been completely taken apart and re-assembled in different configurations several times.  I've modified this instrument so aggressively over the years it really doesn't represent the original design anymore.  I guess I did this because it was "inexpensive" (again, relatively).  I guess I felt I could afford to "play around" with it, that I wasn't afraid to "touch it", etc.  It's manufacture has long been out of the guitar making business.

Picture
My highly modded Shane Targa (re-named, "Engedi 1", often referred to as, "Zac's guitar" {my son} becuase he claims I gave it to him!! LOL). Cost (including mods): $500.00??. . . Next to my Fender American Strat with Super-Vee vibrato (referred to as "Smoothie"). Cost: $2000.00. Which one will show up more in this summers recordings? Who knows, but I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out to be "Zac's guitar"! So much for the cost vs. performance ratio in instruments. . . I guess The term, "you get what you pay for" IS NOT necessarily true.
Last month, in pieces, after many years hiatus, I put this faithful old guitar back together again.  This time stripping off the black lacquer at the headstock and re-finishing the natural wood.  You see, this instrument has some type of magic in it.  At least it seems that way to me. . .  Something in the way it plays, something in the way it sounds, something in the way it looks. . . I can't quite put my finger on it.  I'm expecting to employ it's special charm again in the new songs I'm recording.  Is it an expensive, fancy guitar? No.  Was it ever so? No.  It's features are quite standard and ordinary but there's something in there that I have never been able to find with anything else. . .  So, hello old friend.  Despite acquiring and selling countless other guitars I keep coming back to you, like a love one can't get over. It's nice to have you in use once again.  LET'S MAKE MORE MAGIC!! (no pun intended toward the song REAL MAGIK, that guitar was "Kate", the Telecaster).

 
 
That’s it!  That’s it!. . . awakening suddenly in the middle of the night from what seemed like a lucid dream.  Modern Impressionistic Romanticism; that is what my music is about.  That is what I believe it to be. . . Some form of Modern Impressionistic Romanticism.

For years I (and others) have struggled to define, in a simple series of words, what style of music I write.  When asked about my compositional leanings, I’ve simply replied, “Pop”.  “I do Pop music, or Art Pop. . . or Alternative Pop maybe???”.  But no genre ever seems to fit exactly the feel and sound of my music.  On the positive side, it has helped me stick out from the crowd.  On the negative side, it has made it difficult for the industry to conveniently label what I do. 

If you go to Wikipedia (Forgive me, I’m not trying to write a peer reviewed collage paper here) and type in Romantic music you’ll get a list of characteristics:

“A freedom in form and design; a more intense personal expression of emotion in which fantasy, imagination and a quest for adventure play an important part.”

“Emphasis on lyrical, songlike melodies; adventurous modulation; richer harmonies, often chromatic, with striking use of discords.”  

“Greater sense of ambiguity: especially in tonality or harmonic function, but also in rhythm or meter.”  

“Denser, weightier textures with bold dramatic contrasts, exploring a wider range of pitch, dynamics and tone-colours.”

A query for Impressionistic music might return such results as:

. . .Use of tonal clustering, polychords, polymodal chromaticism , etc.


Now don’t get me wrong, what I do as a solo artist is a form of Popular MusicI’m not trying to compare myself to Beethoven, Liszt, Wagner, Stravinsky, Rachmaninoff, Debussy, Ravel or any of the numerous Romantic and Impressionistic composers of Art Music.  That would be unwarranted.  (I have had opportunity from time to time to compose and arrange such music although).

Never the less, I believe the “Pop” music I write does contain elements of the above-mentioned musical forms. There for, I hereby claim my songwriting, in reality, to be (within it’s own realm) a form of Romanticism and Impressionism. So, I will call it (since it is the 21st century)
Modern Impressionistic Romanticism, or M.I.R. for short.  Will this help clarify my genre placement? No.  You can still call it Pop, but I hope at least I have identified for myself (and the listener) what roots my music comes from.  I certainly don’t think the music I write springs strongly from the Folk or Blues traditions.  I really think my songs are a popular reflection of Art Music and that is what makes me different as a “singer / songwriter”. 

To give an example, here is a demo of me playing piano and singing a song I’ll be putting into full production later this year.  It’s titled “Summer Wind”.  Tell me what you think. Does it not (along with other music I’ve produced) contain motifs of Romanticism and Impressionism?  Call it what you will but, for me, it’s Modern Impressionistic Romanticism.